CD Athletic Intelligence community layer

Nominate the programs the scoreboard misses.

Tell CD Athletics which schools, counties, seasons, and sources deserve a closer look. Community input helps decide what we investigate; rankings and indexes are calculated only from reviewed records and published methodology.

Research desk: Use this page for nominations, corrections, source recommendations, and local context. Do not submit private athlete information.

Evidence standards

Good submissions make the research better without turning the series into a popularity contest.

CD Athletics uses community input to find what deserves review. Public outputs still need source-backed records, clear school identity, county mapping, season context, and sport-specific scoring rules.

Preferred

Source-backed corrections

Official association pages, school pages, tournament PDFs, published brackets, reputable local media, and clear historical records are the strongest inputs.

Strong lead

Program nominations

Nominate programs that appear to outperform enrollment, division, county context, postseason opportunity, or public reputation.

Context

Local knowledge

Coaching continuity, league strength, school-name changes, co-ops, feeder systems, and county context can guide follow-up research.

How submissions are used

Every input gets classified before it can affect public research.

01 Research lead

A nomination or context note that tells CD Athletics what to investigate next.

02 Source check

A claim tied to a link, document, result, school page, or media source that can be reviewed.

03 Data correction

A source-backed issue that may update school identity, county mapping, record, division, postseason result, or profile copy.

Submit to CDA Research

Send a nomination, correction, or source recommendation.

Include the sport, school, county, season or year, and the source URL when you have one. The more specific the submission, the easier it is to verify and act on.

Good submission

School, sport, county, season, what to review, and a source link or citation.

Not enough

Only saying a program is underrated. That can be a lead, but it cannot change a score or public claim.

Do not include

Private athlete contact details, medical information, grades, recruiting conversations, or non-public school records.