Source-backed corrections
Official association pages, school pages, tournament PDFs, published brackets, reputable local media, and clear historical records are the strongest inputs.
CD Athletic Intelligence community layer
Tell CD Athletics which schools, counties, seasons, and sources deserve a closer look. Community input helps decide what we investigate; rankings and indexes are calculated only from reviewed records and published methodology.
Evidence standards
CD Athletics uses community input to find what deserves review. Public outputs still need source-backed records, clear school identity, county mapping, season context, and sport-specific scoring rules.
Official association pages, school pages, tournament PDFs, published brackets, reputable local media, and clear historical records are the strongest inputs.
Nominate programs that appear to outperform enrollment, division, county context, postseason opportunity, or public reputation.
Coaching continuity, league strength, school-name changes, co-ops, feeder systems, and county context can guide follow-up research.
How submissions are used
A nomination or context note that tells CD Athletics what to investigate next.
A claim tied to a link, document, result, school page, or media source that can be reviewed.
A source-backed issue that may update school identity, county mapping, record, division, postseason result, or profile copy.
Submit to CDA Research
Include the sport, school, county, season or year, and the source URL when you have one. The more specific the submission, the easier it is to verify and act on.
School, sport, county, season, what to review, and a source link or citation.
Only saying a program is underrated. That can be a lead, but it cannot change a score or public claim.
Private athlete contact details, medical information, grades, recruiting conversations, or non-public school records.