Football table expanded
The current football table now covers 56 programs across every division with source-status labels and exportable data.
CDA Athletic Intelligenceā¢
CD Athletic Intelligence measures Ohio high school sports achievement in context: opportunity, resources, investment, history, county strength, and community capacity. The goal is not another scoreboard. The goal is better evidence.
Latest findings
These are active intelligence findings and source-backed research lanes readers can understand today.
The current football table now covers 56 programs across every division with source-status labels and exportable data.
Mercer County is a priority small-community strength case because multiple programs show unusual football and athletic identity signals.
CDA is mapping ODEW, report cards, NCES, OHSAA, Census/ACS, financial reports, board minutes, booster packets, and Form 990s.
Girls basketball is the first girls sport expansion because visibility, tournament conversion, and community value are undercovered.
Featured products
56-program football table with division, county, efficiency, trend, source status, and external profile routing.
Open productA winter research lane focused on tournament conversion, consistency, and achievement relative to enrollment.
Open productThe first girls sport expansion, built around visibility, regional strength, and tournament conversion.
Open productThe proprietary layer for athletic success relative to resources, investment, enrollment, and community context.
Open productA limited pilot set for permanent SEO assets and source-backed community context.
Open productMercer, Franklin, and Cuyahoga County pilots for local sports-strength intelligence.
Open productWhat CDA measures
Each layer answers a question that traditional scores, schedules, and rosters do not answer on their own.
Which programs produce the strongest achievement relative to opportunity?
Which schools and departments generate the strongest athletic results relative to resources?
Which athletic departments show the strongest total program depth?
Which communities consistently convert sports culture into measurable strength?
Which programs exceed what size, history, and resources would predict?
Which programs sustain excellence across multiple windows?
Where do facilities and investment appear to change athletic opportunity?
What makes CDA different
CD Athletic Intelligence does not need to recreate live team pages, stat leaders, rosters, photos, or video. Its job is to explain athletic achievement relative to opportunity, resources, and community context.
Success is read against spending signals, facilities, booster context, enrollment, and public/private context when sources allow.
Local context turns statewide data into stories reporters, sponsors, schools, and alumni can actually use.
Products still in collection or QA are marked with pilot, validation, and confidence status instead of being made to look final.
Research status
| Product | Status | Source priority | Target | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Football Efficiency Rankings | Pilot Published | OHSAA and school/team records | Live pilot | Medium |
| Boys Basketball Efficiency Rankings | Source Identified | OHSAA tournament and school/team records | Winter research lane | Low |
| Girls Basketball Efficiency Rankings | Source Identified | OHSAA tournament and school/team records | First girls sport expansion | Low |
| School Profiles | In QA | ODEW, NCES, school sites, OHSAA, public team pages | Pilot profiles | Low-Medium |
| County Profiles | Pilot Published | Census/ACS, OHSAA, school mapping, football pilot table | Three pilot counties | Low-Medium |
| Athletic ROI Index | Source Identified | ODEW, report cards, NCES, district financials, board minutes | Methodology pilot | Low |