Pilot published
CDA Efficiency Score
Measures: Performance relative to enrollment, division, competition, history, and postseason output.
Why it matters: Which programs produce the strongest achievement relative to opportunity?
Does not measure: It does not replace official rankings, live schedules, or roster-level performance.
Example: A smaller school with repeated deep playoff runs can rate highly even without the largest enrollment or media footprint.
- Wins and losses
- Postseason advancement
- State performance
- Enrollment context
- Division
- Historical consistency
Methodology pilot
CDA Athletic ROI Index
Measures: Athletic success relative to spending, enrollment, facilities, booster signals, public/private context, and community capacity.
Why it matters: Which schools and departments generate the strongest athletic results relative to resources?
Does not measure: It does not assign blame for funding differences or assume every dollar is directly tied to athletic outcomes.
Example: A district with modest resource signals and repeated postseason output becomes a high-priority Athletic ROI review case.
- District spending
- Per-pupil spending
- Athletic spending where available
- Booster support
- Facility investment
- Enrollment
- Postseason output
- Multi-sport performance
Source identified
CDA Athletic Department Index
Measures: Multi-sport performance, consistency, state appearances, championship output, boys/girls program balance, and postseason breadth.
Why it matters: Which athletic departments show the strongest total program depth?
Does not measure: It does not treat one elite team as proof of full department strength.
Example: A department with several sports reaching late postseason rounds can rate strongly even without one dominant flagship team.
- Sport offerings
- Tournament outcomes
- State appearances
- Championships
- Competitive consistency
- Program depth
Source identified
CDA Overachievement Index
Measures: Performance relative to expectations set by enrollment, history, competitive environment, and community context.
Why it matters: Which programs exceed what size, history, and resources would predict?
Does not measure: It does not reward one-season spikes without a source-backed signal.
Example: A program with repeated strong seasons after a long quiet baseline becomes an overachievement review case.
- Historical baseline
- Enrollment
- Division
- County context
- Program trajectory
- Postseason conversion
Pilot method
CDA Dynasty Index
Measures: Durable output across five-, ten-, and twenty-year windows with postseason and title context.
Why it matters: Which programs sustain excellence across multiple windows?
Does not measure: It does not overvalue old reputation if recent output has faded.
Example: A program with repeated deep runs across eras separates from a single-cycle contender.
- 5-year results
- 10-year results
- 20-year results
- Playoff frequency
- Deep runs
- Championship signal
Future enrichment
CDA Infrastructure Index
Measures: Stadium, indoor, weight-room, turf, training, and facility-investment signals.
Why it matters: Where do facilities and investment appear to change athletic opportunity?
Does not measure: It does not assume newer facilities automatically create better programs.
Example: A facility investment followed by participation growth or postseason improvement becomes a future research question.
- Board minutes
- Facility pages
- Capital projects
- Bond/levy records
- Booster donations
- Public facility notes