Reference and correction path
Schools can submit corrected names, counties, records, postseason history, source links, and program notes.
CD Athletic Intelligence media kit
Share CD Athletic Intelligence clearly.
This kit is for schools, coaches, reporters, alumni pages, sponsors, and community accounts that want to cite CD Athletic Intelligence clearly and responsibly.
Media kit status:
CD Athletic Intelligence is a Chihuahua Digital initiative and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by OHSAA.
Who this helps
Different audiences need different ways into the same research.
The kit keeps CD Athletic Intelligence practical for the community while protecting the credibility schools and reporters need before sharing it.
Citation and story angles
Reporters can cite previews responsibly and use published releases with report year, data-through season, methodology, and caveats.
Shareable research hooks
Families, alumni, and fans can share program spotlights, county reports, and nomination prompts without treating nominations as votes.
Citation language
Use the right label for the right stage.
CDA is designed to be cited, shared, and discussed. The best language stays clear about the report, source basis, and local context.
For early looks
Use: CD Athletics is developing CD Athletic Intelligence for this sport, school, county, or community story.
For published reports
Use the report name, year or season, key insight, and methodology link when available.
Avoid
Avoid implying CDA scores are official association ratings, recruiting ratings, or final statewide standings.
Shareable assets
Each CDA report can become a local media package.
Assets will vary by sport and source confidence, but the goal is a repeatable package that schools and media can understand quickly.
Top lists and index tables
The Efficiency 25, Program Strength Indexes, county strength views, and sport-specific intelligence reports.
View rankings hubProgram and county context
Program references, county strength, postseason history, source status, and shareable analysis a school community can understand quickly.
Open school profilesSocial card packages
School cards, county cards, Top 25 graphics, methodology explainers, and release-week share assets.
Methodology notes
Plain-language context on what each metric rewards, what it does not claim, and what data was reviewed.
Open methodologyNomination desk
A public route for corrections, source recommendations, school context, county notes, and media inquiries.
Submit research leadRelease calendar and franchises
Recurring formats like County Power Index, Overperformance Board, Under The Radar, and Growth Watch.
Open reports hubStory angles
What makes CDA Research different from standard local sports coverage.
Overperformance
Which programs do the most with enrollment size, division context, postseason opportunity, and available history?
County strength
Which counties generate unusual program depth relative to population, school base, and sport-specific context?
Balanced coverage
Girls basketball, volleyball, softball, soccer, track, cross country, and growth sports are core parts of the series, not side projects.
Requests and corrections
Send the source, not just the opinion.
Program nominations are welcome, but public claims need evidence. The strongest submissions include school, sport, county, season, source URL, and the specific claim that can be reviewed.
Good correction
A specific record, school identity, county, postseason result, source link, or season context that can be checked.
Good nomination
A program that appears to outperform enrollment, division, county, postseason opportunity, or public reputation.
Not accepted
Private athlete information, non-public school records, or claims that cannot be checked against a source.